<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Good Conversation About Mutual Funds Versus Index Funds</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.moneycrashers.com/a-good-conversation-about-mutual-funds-versus-index-funds/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.moneycrashers.com/a-good-conversation-about-mutual-funds-versus-index-funds/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=a-good-conversation-about-mutual-funds-versus-index-funds</link>
	<description>personal finance blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 04:07:50 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: ekrabs</title>
		<link>http://www.moneycrashers.com/a-good-conversation-about-mutual-funds-versus-index-funds/comment-page-1/#comment-5639</link>
		<dc:creator>ekrabs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 14:32:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneycrashers.com/a-good-conversation-about-mutual-funds-versus-index-funds/#comment-5639</guid>
		<description>Incidentally, here&#039;s a somewhat relevant article on Vanguard index funds versus Vanguard managed funds.

http://indexuniverse.com/component/content/article/3864.html

In it, you&#039;ll see that the results are mixed either way, and that the more important question to ask is what your asset allocation should be like.

Sometimes, simple questions don&#039;t come with simple answers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Incidentally, here&#8217;s a somewhat relevant article on Vanguard index funds versus Vanguard managed funds.</p>
<p><a href="http://indexuniverse.com/component/content/article/3864.html" rel="nofollow">http://indexuniverse.com/component/content/article/3864.html</a></p>
<p>In it, you&#8217;ll see that the results are mixed either way, and that the more important question to ask is what your asset allocation should be like.</p>
<p>Sometimes, simple questions don&#8217;t come with simple answers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ekrabs</title>
		<link>http://www.moneycrashers.com/a-good-conversation-about-mutual-funds-versus-index-funds/comment-page-1/#comment-5627</link>
		<dc:creator>ekrabs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 19:55:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneycrashers.com/a-good-conversation-about-mutual-funds-versus-index-funds/#comment-5627</guid>
		<description>Ugh, please pardon my grammar again.  That&#039;s what I get for being in a rush.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ugh, please pardon my grammar again.  That&#8217;s what I get for being in a rush.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ekrabs</title>
		<link>http://www.moneycrashers.com/a-good-conversation-about-mutual-funds-versus-index-funds/comment-page-1/#comment-5626</link>
		<dc:creator>ekrabs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 19:54:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneycrashers.com/a-good-conversation-about-mutual-funds-versus-index-funds/#comment-5626</guid>
		<description>Oh, well, thank you for the endorsement? It&#039;s a shame that my grammar wasn&#039;t so great.  If I knew I was going to get quoted, I probably would have proof-read. :D

I would also add that not a investment companies are created equal.  Sadly,  the company that&#039;s handle 401k isn&#039;t that great (in my opinion), AND all of their funds still have a load.  The second I leave this job, I am taking rolling my money out, pronto!

However, there ARE good, reputable, actively managed fund companies out there.  And yes, to a very large extent, I agree that that you&#039;re essentially investing your money in a fund manager.  However, it would also depend what type of investment and goals.  All this should be available in the prospectus, and I think it&#039;s important enough for all investors to pore through.

I didn&#039;t quite catch the wording &quot;long-term&quot; the first time around, but if that is the case (your 401k), and assuming that you DO have a choice (and like me, you may not right now), but if you do have a choice, using, say, Vanguard&#039;s Target Retirement Fund is actually pretty efficient.  For one fund (of funds), you really can&#039;t go wrong.  But again, that&#039;s for the long time, and that&#039;s stating my bias as a Bogle fan.

My shorter-term investments are in either actively managed funds or individual stocks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, well, thank you for the endorsement? It&#8217;s a shame that my grammar wasn&#8217;t so great.  If I knew I was going to get quoted, I probably would have proof-read. <img src='http://www.moneycrashers.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I would also add that not a investment companies are created equal.  Sadly,  the company that&#8217;s handle 401k isn&#8217;t that great (in my opinion), AND all of their funds still have a load.  The second I leave this job, I am taking rolling my money out, pronto!</p>
<p>However, there ARE good, reputable, actively managed fund companies out there.  And yes, to a very large extent, I agree that that you&#8217;re essentially investing your money in a fund manager.  However, it would also depend what type of investment and goals.  All this should be available in the prospectus, and I think it&#8217;s important enough for all investors to pore through.</p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t quite catch the wording &#8220;long-term&#8221; the first time around, but if that is the case (your 401k), and assuming that you DO have a choice (and like me, you may not right now), but if you do have a choice, using, say, Vanguard&#8217;s Target Retirement Fund is actually pretty efficient.  For one fund (of funds), you really can&#8217;t go wrong.  But again, that&#8217;s for the long time, and that&#8217;s stating my bias as a Bogle fan.</p>
<p>My shorter-term investments are in either actively managed funds or individual stocks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J</title>
		<link>http://www.moneycrashers.com/a-good-conversation-about-mutual-funds-versus-index-funds/comment-page-1/#comment-5623</link>
		<dc:creator>J</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 16:39:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneycrashers.com/a-good-conversation-about-mutual-funds-versus-index-funds/#comment-5623</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s one of a multitude of research papers that pretty much lays it all out for you.

http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1105775

If after reading this, and other like it, you think you can consistently pick the winning active managed funds, then I wish you luck.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s one of a multitude of research papers that pretty much lays it all out for you.</p>
<p><a href="http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1105775" rel="nofollow">http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1105775</a></p>
<p>If after reading this, and other like it, you think you can consistently pick the winning active managed funds, then I wish you luck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
