<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Refreshing Approach To Holiday Bonus Giving</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.moneycrashers.com/a-refreshing-approach-to-holiday-bonus-giving/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.moneycrashers.com/a-refreshing-approach-to-holiday-bonus-giving/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=a-refreshing-approach-to-holiday-bonus-giving</link>
	<description>personal finance blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 01:58:57 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Lea</title>
		<link>http://www.moneycrashers.com/a-refreshing-approach-to-holiday-bonus-giving/comment-page-1/#comment-5428</link>
		<dc:creator>Lea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2008 20:13:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneycrashers.com/a-refreshing-approach-to-holiday-bonus-giving/#comment-5428</guid>
		<description>not necessarily taxable income if they never had constructive receipt.  It appears that the employees identify recipients, but the company transfers the money.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>not necessarily taxable income if they never had constructive receipt.  It appears that the employees identify recipients, but the company transfers the money.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Minimum Wage</title>
		<link>http://www.moneycrashers.com/a-refreshing-approach-to-holiday-bonus-giving/comment-page-1/#comment-5419</link>
		<dc:creator>Minimum Wage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Dec 2007 02:54:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneycrashers.com/a-refreshing-approach-to-holiday-bonus-giving/#comment-5419</guid>
		<description>Anything donated to an individual would not be deductible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anything donated to an individual would not be deductible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Minimum Wage</title>
		<link>http://www.moneycrashers.com/a-refreshing-approach-to-holiday-bonus-giving/comment-page-1/#comment-5418</link>
		<dc:creator>Minimum Wage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Dec 2007 02:50:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneycrashers.com/a-refreshing-approach-to-holiday-bonus-giving/#comment-5418</guid>
		<description>Waaait a minute...

The $1,000 bonus is taxable income to the employee receiving it.  When the employee donates it to a QUALIFYING charitable organization, it becomes deductible ONLY if the employee itemizes deductions.  

Some of the employees - especially younger and/or newer employees who do not yet own homes - won&#039;t be able to itemize, and therefore will wind up worse off when the $1,000 which they don&#039;t get to keep is taxed.

Who would accept a &quot;bonus&quot; that makes them worse off?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Waaait a minute&#8230;</p>
<p>The $1,000 bonus is taxable income to the employee receiving it.  When the employee donates it to a QUALIFYING charitable organization, it becomes deductible ONLY if the employee itemizes deductions.  </p>
<p>Some of the employees &#8211; especially younger and/or newer employees who do not yet own homes &#8211; won&#8217;t be able to itemize, and therefore will wind up worse off when the $1,000 which they don&#8217;t get to keep is taxed.</p>
<p>Who would accept a &#8220;bonus&#8221; that makes them worse off?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ParatrooperJJ</title>
		<link>http://www.moneycrashers.com/a-refreshing-approach-to-holiday-bonus-giving/comment-page-1/#comment-5416</link>
		<dc:creator>ParatrooperJJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 19:22:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneycrashers.com/a-refreshing-approach-to-holiday-bonus-giving/#comment-5416</guid>
		<description>Hopefully the bank gave the money straight to the designated recipient and not to the workers, otherwise the workers will owe income tax on the $1000.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hopefully the bank gave the money straight to the designated recipient and not to the workers, otherwise the workers will owe income tax on the $1000.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://www.moneycrashers.com/a-refreshing-approach-to-holiday-bonus-giving/comment-page-1/#comment-5412</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 15:52:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneycrashers.com/a-refreshing-approach-to-holiday-bonus-giving/#comment-5412</guid>
		<description>The article mentions (waaay down at the bottom) they got their regular 4.5% bonus.  This exercise was on top of that.  Interesting idea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The article mentions (waaay down at the bottom) they got their regular 4.5% bonus.  This exercise was on top of that.  Interesting idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
