<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: A Refreshing Approach To Holiday Bonus Giving</title> <atom:link href="http://www.moneycrashers.com/a-refreshing-approach-to-holiday-bonus-giving/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.moneycrashers.com/a-refreshing-approach-to-holiday-bonus-giving/</link> <description>Personal Finance Blog, Your Guide to Financial Fitness</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 01:50:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" /> <item><title>By: Lea</title><link>http://www.moneycrashers.com/a-refreshing-approach-to-holiday-bonus-giving/#comment-5428</link> <dc:creator>Lea</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2008 20:13:59 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneycrashers.com/a-refreshing-approach-to-holiday-bonus-giving/#comment-5428</guid> <description>not necessarily taxable income if they never had constructive receipt.  It appears that the employees identify recipients, but the company transfers the money.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>not necessarily taxable income if they never had constructive receipt.  It appears that the employees identify recipients, but the company transfers the money.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Minimum Wage</title><link>http://www.moneycrashers.com/a-refreshing-approach-to-holiday-bonus-giving/#comment-5419</link> <dc:creator>Minimum Wage</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 25 Dec 2007 02:54:56 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneycrashers.com/a-refreshing-approach-to-holiday-bonus-giving/#comment-5419</guid> <description>Anything donated to an individual would not be deductible.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anything donated to an individual would not be deductible.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Minimum Wage</title><link>http://www.moneycrashers.com/a-refreshing-approach-to-holiday-bonus-giving/#comment-5418</link> <dc:creator>Minimum Wage</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 25 Dec 2007 02:50:24 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneycrashers.com/a-refreshing-approach-to-holiday-bonus-giving/#comment-5418</guid> <description>Waaait a minute...
The $1,000 bonus is taxable income to the employee receiving it.  When the employee donates it to a QUALIFYING charitable organization, it becomes deductible ONLY if the employee itemizes deductions.
Some of the employees - especially younger and/or newer employees who do not yet own homes - won&#039;t be able to itemize, and therefore will wind up worse off when the $1,000 which they don&#039;t get to keep is taxed.
Who would accept a &quot;bonus&quot; that makes them worse off?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Waaait a minute&#8230;</p><p>The $1,000 bonus is taxable income to the employee receiving it.  When the employee donates it to a QUALIFYING charitable organization, it becomes deductible ONLY if the employee itemizes deductions.</p><p>Some of the employees &#8211; especially younger and/or newer employees who do not yet own homes &#8211; won&#8217;t be able to itemize, and therefore will wind up worse off when the $1,000 which they don&#8217;t get to keep is taxed.</p><p>Who would accept a &#8220;bonus&#8221; that makes them worse off?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: ParatrooperJJ</title><link>http://www.moneycrashers.com/a-refreshing-approach-to-holiday-bonus-giving/#comment-5416</link> <dc:creator>ParatrooperJJ</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 19:22:55 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneycrashers.com/a-refreshing-approach-to-holiday-bonus-giving/#comment-5416</guid> <description>Hopefully the bank gave the money straight to the designated recipient and not to the workers, otherwise the workers will owe income tax on the $1000.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hopefully the bank gave the money straight to the designated recipient and not to the workers, otherwise the workers will owe income tax on the $1000.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Robert</title><link>http://www.moneycrashers.com/a-refreshing-approach-to-holiday-bonus-giving/#comment-5412</link> <dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 15:52:38 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneycrashers.com/a-refreshing-approach-to-holiday-bonus-giving/#comment-5412</guid> <description>The article mentions (waaay down at the bottom) they got their regular 4.5% bonus.  This exercise was on top of that.  Interesting idea.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The article mentions (waaay down at the bottom) they got their regular 4.5% bonus.  This exercise was on top of that.  Interesting idea.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
