<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Financial Question of the Day: What To Do With Child Support</title> <atom:link href="http://www.moneycrashers.com/financial-question-of-the-day-what-to-do-with-child-support/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.moneycrashers.com/financial-question-of-the-day-what-to-do-with-child-support/</link> <description>Personal Finance Blog, Your Guide to Financial Fitness</description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 20:13:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" /> <item><title>By: Mac</title><link>http://www.moneycrashers.com/financial-question-of-the-day-what-to-do-with-child-support/#comment-10771</link> <dc:creator>Mac</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2010 03:33:41 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneycrashers.com/financial-question-of-the-day-what-to-do-with-child-support/#comment-10771</guid> <description>Kind of a no-brainer, but it definitely is a moral question for some.  No matter what, the money needs to be paid.  That&#039;s not the question.  The custodial parent then has the &quot;moral&quot; obligation to use the money on their child, but I can see that also being used for food, housing, etc.  If there&#039;s extra, I&#039;d be ok with it being used for anything, really.  For those celebrity divorces, I&#039;m sure the $50K/month some spouses receive in settlements aren&#039;t used to buy a toddler golden blocks or diamond-studded books.
Point is, they money can and should be able to used for anything, as long as the child is well taken care of.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kind of a no-brainer, but it definitely is a moral question for some.  No matter what, the money needs to be paid.  That&#8217;s not the question.  The custodial parent then has the &#8220;moral&#8221; obligation to use the money on their child, but I can see that also being used for food, housing, etc.  If there&#8217;s extra, I&#8217;d be ok with it being used for anything, really.  For those celebrity divorces, I&#8217;m sure the $50K/month some spouses receive in settlements aren&#8217;t used to buy a toddler golden blocks or diamond-studded books.</p><p>Point is, they money can and should be able to used for anything, as long as the child is well taken care of.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: burgundydurango</title><link>http://www.moneycrashers.com/financial-question-of-the-day-what-to-do-with-child-support/#comment-5610</link> <dc:creator>burgundydurango</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 23:57:52 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneycrashers.com/financial-question-of-the-day-what-to-do-with-child-support/#comment-5610</guid> <description>I agree with Minimum Wage that it is pointless to mention it in court unless you&#039;ve got some kind of crazy proof that the child(ren) isn&#039;t being provided for. The parent receiving the support can easily argue (and rightly so, i think) that the support they&#039;ve spent on themselves is replacing funds in their own budget which they spent on the child. I&#039;ve been paying child support for 14 years on my two daughters (yes, I&#039;m current on all my payments), in addition to extra money here and there when necessary, and though I may not support all of the financial decisions they&#039;re mother makes but I also don&#039;t really have any say. It&#039;s her budget and as long as the girls are well cared for (they are) then that&#039;s all I can really worry about. I should add that the best financial decision you can make if you are the one paying support is this: DON&#039;T FALL BEHIND IN YOUR PAYMENTS!!! It&#039;s more difficult to catch up then it is to stay current. I know someone who recently got hit with a judgement of over $100,000 on back support. The interest alone on that is over $600 a month, this person will likely never pay this amount off.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Minimum Wage that it is pointless to mention it in court unless you&#8217;ve got some kind of crazy proof that the child(ren) isn&#8217;t being provided for. The parent receiving the support can easily argue (and rightly so, i think) that the support they&#8217;ve spent on themselves is replacing funds in their own budget which they spent on the child. I&#8217;ve been paying child support for 14 years on my two daughters (yes, I&#8217;m current on all my payments), in addition to extra money here and there when necessary, and though I may not support all of the financial decisions they&#8217;re mother makes but I also don&#8217;t really have any say. It&#8217;s her budget and as long as the girls are well cared for (they are) then that&#8217;s all I can really worry about. I should add that the best financial decision you can make if you are the one paying support is this: DON&#8217;T FALL BEHIND IN YOUR PAYMENTS!!! It&#8217;s more difficult to catch up then it is to stay current. I know someone who recently got hit with a judgement of over $100,000 on back support. The interest alone on that is over $600 a month, this person will likely never pay this amount off.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Minimum Wage</title><link>http://www.moneycrashers.com/financial-question-of-the-day-what-to-do-with-child-support/#comment-5562</link> <dc:creator>Minimum Wage</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 02:42:26 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneycrashers.com/financial-question-of-the-day-what-to-do-with-child-support/#comment-5562</guid> <description>Bring up those issues with the court is usually a pointless exercise, so I wouldn&#039;t even bother suggesting it.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bring up those issues with the court is usually a pointless exercise, so I wouldn&#8217;t even bother suggesting it.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
