What Is Whole Life Insurance Explained – Definition & Benefits

whole life insuranceHaving spent 20 years on Wall Street, I was fortunate enough to meet many intelligent people – and on Wall Street, intelligent people become rich. So when I was speaking recently to my old boss, I asked him about the stock market and what he was buying. He told me he hadn’t bought a stock in 10 years.

What’s this? Everybody on Wall Street has a couple of favorite stocks that they love to brag about. So where on earth was he putting his money? His answer: “Whole life insurance.”

That answer could not have been more surprising, but after an hour he had me totally engrossed in the concept. He had done so much research and analyzed all of the components so thoroughly, I knew that he was right on the money. This is what smart, wealthy people are doing with their money, and they’re getting wealthier. Why? Because they are taking advantage of built-in savings options, tax advantages, and dividends.

What Is Whole Life Insurance?

Whole life is a type of life insurance contract that provides insurance coverage of the contract holder for his or her entire life. Upon the inevitable death of the contract holder, the insurance payout is made to the contract’s beneficiaries. These policies also include a savings component, which accumulates a cash value. This cash value is one of the key elements of whole life insurance.

Similarities & Differences to Term Life Insurance

  • Just like term life insurance, beneficiaries exist in a whole life insurance policy. They receive the death benefit upon the contract holder’s death.
  • The most obvious difference, at least superficially, is cost. In some cases, whole life insurance premiums are three to five times as much as term life premiums, at least at the onset. However, term life insurance lasts a “term”: a specified period, usually 10 or 20 years, before the policy expires. The younger you are and the better health you are in, the lower the cost. When the term is up, you can renew the policy, generally at a much higher premium, and depending on your age and health. Whole life insurance premiums, while higher initially, never go up – this is key. The policy is structured to last your entire life, and as long as you keep paying the premiums, the policy will be in force regardless of age and health.
  • The premiums in whole life policies go towards a cash value as well as a death benefit – term life has just a death benefit.

Are the Higher Premiums Worth the Cost?

Are the higher premiums worth the cost? In a word, yes.

The first key advantage of whole life insurance is that the cost of the premiums paid to the policy never increases, as long as you make sure to pay the premiums and the policy doesn’t lapse. The reason why this is important is because with term policies, your rates rise over time. This is due to the changes in your health and age. As you get older, your chances of dying increase. Since the life insurance company takes on that risk, they increase the cost of premiums.

With whole life insurance, the premium cost stays the same as long as the policy is in force. Even if you become gravely ill, the cost never changes. It’s guaranteed – as long as you pay your premiums. In fact, as the years go by, the policy actually gets cheaper. This is because of inflation, which erodes the value of money. By having a premium that never changes, you are essentially paying for the policy with “cheaper dollars.”

The cost of term life polices, on the other hand, is only guaranteed until the end of the term – usually 5, 10, or 20 years. After this point, term policy premiums can be raised based not just on your age and health, but also on the rise in inflation.

whole life insurance covers you throughout your entire life

Cash Value, Taxes, and Dividends

In whole life policies, the premiums paid go toward increasing the cash value and, if you are willing to pay more, increasing the death benefit. Further, your cash value earns interest similar to a savings account.

Your cash value and death benefit can never decrease in value unless you start withdrawing the cash value from the policy, or unless you stop paying your premiums. In this way, your whole life policy is akin to a savings account: When you pay your premium, part of the money goes toward the insurance costs, while the rest goes towards increasing your cash value. This cash value earns interest, which is guaranteed by the insurance company, as is the death benefit. The guarantee is as strong as the company that holds your policy, so financial stability is a key element in choosing an insurance company.

Tax Advantages

When you put money into your 401k or traditional IRA, you are only deferring taxes, as you pay taxes on all of the money when you withdraw it during retirement. With a whole life insurance policy, you pay the premiums with after-tax dollars. The cash value grows without taxation. You would only be taxed if your withdrawals from the policy exceed what you put into it, and you have the ability to remove gains tax-free by taking a loan off the policy.


The whole life policy pays a dividend. The key thing here, again, is that these dividends aren’t taxed, but are considered returns of premium. So, if at the end of the year the insurance company pays out $1,000 in dividends on your policy, you don’t pay taxes on that money. You can take that money in the form of a check, reinvest it in the cash value of the policy, or use the dollars to purchase additional, paid-up insurance. Those dollars will buy more life insurance, provide a bigger death benefit, and earn interest.

Borrowing Against Your Policy

It is possible to borrow against the cash value of your whole life insurance policy. For example, if you ever find that you are in need of cash, perhaps to help pay for a child’s education, you can borrow money from the cash value of the policy. You do pay interest to the insurance company on this loan, but the loan rates are very competitive with regular bank rates on home equity lines. In most cases, the loan balance can be repaid at the time of death by deducting it from the death benefit.

Also, there’s the potential for tax-free income. By borrowing against the policy, you can take money out of the policy tax-free. Though you will pay interest on the loan, depending on your income tax bracket, it can be substantially lower than what you’d pay in taxes. This also allows individuals younger than 59 1/2 to access income for an early retirement without having to pay hefty taxes and penalties.

Lastly, and particularly appealing to the very wealthy, is the fact that in some states, all or most of the money in a whole life policy is exempt from creditors. In these states, if you are ever sued, that money is viewed as protected because it is intended to benefit someone else: the beneficiary.

The Strength of the Insurance Company

Since whole life insurance policies are a true long-term investment, your relationship with the insurance company will literally last a lifetime. Picking a company with the highest ratings both for financial stability and customer service is the key. Do your homework and make sure that you feel comfortable with your insurance broker. Remember, the guarantees offered in whole life policies are only as strong as the companies who make them.

The highest rated overall insurance companies according to ConsumerSearch.com are as follows:

choose an insurance company you are comfortable with

Disadvantages of Whole Life Insurance

While there are many positive aspects to whole life insurance, there are also some disadvantages to consider:

  1. The cash value of a whole life insurance policy will not start to build until two to three years of continual premium payments.
  2. Whole life is much more expensive than other types of life insurance, such as term life. Make sure that the cash value and permanence of the insurance policy justify the excess premiums relative to a term policy with the same death benefit.
  3. Whole life policies can be extremely complicated and there are subtle differences between policies. Careful research, a solid relationship with the insurance agent, and a clear understanding of your insurance needs and priorities are keys to getting the right policy
  4. Whole life policies have a “surrender period”: A length of time that you must keep your money with the insurance company before withdrawing it. If you wish to withdraw it before the end of the surrender period, you pay a surrender charge, usually around 10% of the account value. Commonly a surrender period is 5 to 10 years, but you should read the policy carefully to make sure you understand how long this period is on your particular policy.
  5. Loans are not immediately available. Most policies have a minimum cash balance (typically at least $10,000) and a period of time you must have the policy (typically five years or more) before you can borrow against the policy. Once you have reached these milestones, you can typically borrow up to 75% of the cash value.

Final Word

The key to deciding whether whole life insurance works for you is to decide why you are buying insurance. In short, if you have a long-term insurance need and you want to supplement your retirement savings and long-range financial flexibility, a whole life policy is a great product.

The key to whole life insurance is to map out exactly what your overall financial picture is before going down that road. Once you have decided to invest in whole life, commit to it and understand its benefits and limitations so you can best utilize the policy to achieve your financial goals. Also be sure to consult a financial professional who is aware of all of your needs and concerns before making this decision.

Do you have a whole life insurance policy? What are some of the benefits that you’re most attracted to?

  • http://www.swimupstreamtowealth.com/ Kirk Kinder

    Evan – I am new to your site so I haven’t read much, but I totally disagree with this article. Usually, the beneficiary only gets the life insurance benefits, not the benefits plus cash value. Certainly, you can pay a rider to get both, but I rarely see customers with that option. The returns on whole life policies rarely do better than short term bonds. This is going to become even more true as many of the insurance companies that were holding 30 year bonds from the 80s are reinvesting at today’s low rates. Also, over 70% of these policies lapse within ten years so it is clear that these policies are pushed on customers and not useful to the client.

    Insurance should be used to cover risks you can’t afford to take yourself. If you want tax deferred growth, buy an annuity from Vanguard or another low cost provider. Then buy term for as many years as you can. The savings in insurance going into your annuity or other investments will eventually reduce or completely eliminate your need for insurance.

    Certainly, there are cases for whole life such as ILITs or business partnerships, but I don’t think promoting whole life as insurance is prudent for the vast majority of Americans.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Myrtle-Bobby/100002332665168 Myrtle Bobby

    Whole life as an investment is strictly for the wealthy with disposable income to spare and who can afford the hefty premiums for million dollar policies.

    For the average Joe or Jane, Universal Life is a far better type of low cost permanent life insurance policy with virtually all the benefits of both term and whole virtually non of the disadvantages.

    Best bet for young families is a combination of term plus universal.

  • http://twitter.com/thedebtfreebaby Ryan DeLeon

    I have never seen a case where buying term and investing the difference isn’t the better plan.

    • Vincent L.

      Ryan, taking into account that 90% of baby boomers cant produce enough income, 40k/yr to live and they have lived though one of the most prosperous times our nation has ever seen. I think the case is simple, by term and invest the different does not work. Also when you say “Invest”, I am assuming you mean 401k, stocks, mutual funds, etc. unfortunately that is just a crap shoot with little guarantees to the individual investor.

  • Mlewis1945

    In my experience, most people are way under insured. Few could afford the cost of adequate insurance coverage if they used whole life. The only supposed benefit that I might recognize is that the forced savings in order to keep the insurance, but that conflicts with the need to have an adequate amount in the first place.

    • Just_me_and_God

      Exactly, see my main posting.

  • Frank

    Interesting article. Thank You for sharing Your knowledge.

  • http://www.reisagency.com/ Samuel

    Kirk raises some good points. Likewise, that’s a good point about inflation negative affect on the dollar’s value. That could be a significant factor since the Federal Reserve has pumped up the money supply to such large extremes.

    • WF

      Speaking of inflation’s effect on the buying power of the dollar, you have to also apply this concept to the value and buying power of the death benefit. You see, an insurance company does not expect to pay out a death benefit until decades later in the vast majority of cases. Think about what the buying power of that death benefit is 20, 30, 50 years from when the policy was first purchased. Whole Life does not have an answer for this inflation risk. Buying paid up additions is not really an answer to inflation risk either because dividends are not guaranteed and you do not get enough additional insurance to have your death benefit keep up with normal inflation. That is why buying paid up additonal insurance is a rip off. You are buying something with present value money that is going to be worth less and less as time goes by. It is better to just take the dividends and invest it or use it to pay for part of your premium. These are my criticisms of WL.
      A better solution today is the Index Universal Life policy. Not only does it have a solution for the inflation risk of the death benefit (by taking advantage of the Corridor Rule), there are valuable accelerated benefits riders that give you the ability to make use of the death benefit while you are still alive if you meet certain triggering conditions that are health related.

  • q22222

    This is a foolish was to go. There is no real investment component. The best life insurance is “Private Placement Variable Life” , which has a real cash buildup using a choice of hedge funds
    which is rapped by the insurance and the grow this tax free and with the right structure is tax free of estate taxes in an ILIT.

    Companies like Philadelphia Life, American General, Prudential, John Hancock have it.

  • woogroove

    dose anyone know what the rider plan means with the whole life insurance???

    • Just_me_and_God

      Depends on what the “Rider” is for, there are many kinds of riders.

    • Just_me_and_God

      Feel free to tell me which rider or riders you have, or are interested in getting!
      Otherwise I can’t help you!

  • Vincent L.

    Evan, great article, right to the point on benefits of cash value whole life insurance. Anyone with an income should have this. This is a true asset and closest thing to guaranteed as you can get.

  • Yanez


    If I were to borrow from my savings account, would I be charged borrowing from my own money I am putting in to my savings account?

    and if I had a whole life insurance policy for 20yrs and died at the age of 60 yrs old, would my beneficiaries receive my life insurance policy AND my savings since I was paying in to both?

    • Just_me_and_God

      If you are a multi-millionaire this information, on this webpage “may” be useful to you. But, you must be able to take full advantage of the Tax and Inheritance Laws.

      Check with your Tax Attorney. Notice the people the author is talking about, and he himself are RICH!

      However, if you are not extremely wealthy, RUN!
      It is entirely self-serving to the Insurance Industry!

      The Insurance Industry, like every other industry pushes the product that makes them the most money. When an Insurance Agent sells a “Cash Value” Policy, they get a 70% commission, but they only receive a 40% commission when selling Term Insurance. Usually the policy owner gets no Cash Values for the first two years, (depends on the actual policy itself, sometimes three!) All of your “first two years’ worth of ‘savings’” went to pay commissions and as profit for the company.

      There is a saying among Insurance Agents: “Do you want to Eat, or do you want to Sleep?” (70% versus 40% commissions)

      Then if you do buy Cash Value Life, your Agent is still bugging you to BUY MORE INSURANCE, because you are STILL UNDER-INSURED! But, you are paying all you can afford!

      No, Yanez you would not on a standard Whole Life Policy.
      You are paying for the Life Insurance AND paying EXTRA for the “Savings” part. The savings builds INSUDE the Insurance part, reducing the amount owed by the Insurance Company upon your death. You can never collect BOTH savings AND the Full Face Value Beneficiary amount of the Policy. You only can get one or the other, but you PAY for BOTH!

      If you turn the usual graph that the insurance salesman shows you, upside down it is easy to understand this. As the “savings” grows, the Insurance part (What the company owes you) decreases by the same amount! However, the Face Value remains the same.

      Dividends are not taxed because it is NOT a profit to you, but a “Partial return of a PURPOSELY OVERCHARGED PREMIUM” as per a 1911 Treasury Decision. Notice that “Dividends” are projected up to 50 or more years in advance! (See if you can get any six month advanced estimates of what the amount of the annual dividend will be on a Stock Investment.)

      What you want is an “Annual Renewable Term” Policy; the premium starts out extremely small and gets bigger over time. Then if you want “Savings” from an Insurance Company, purchase it as an Annuity, and then if you die, your beneficiaries receive BOTH the full amount of the Insurance AND the Annuity. Alternatively, you can save your money anywhere else!

      At 67, I am STILL paying LESS on an ‘ART’ than I was at 22 years of age for a Whole Life Insurance policy that I had (cost per year, per thousand) (it is the equivalent of ‘miles per gallon’)

      If you calculate the cost per year, per thousand of the Whole Life AFTER deducting the Cash Value “savings” you still get an INCREASING cost every year!

      Let’s say that you buy a 100K Whole Life policy and the cost per thousand is initially $26.00 per thousand per year, it will cost you $2600 per year.

      Much later, you now have $28,000 in “Cash Value” savings. Subtract 28,000 from 100,000 equals $72,000 that the insurance company owes you. (If you were to die then the company would still pay only $100,000, by kicking in your “OWN” $28K into the pot.) Now calculate your cost per year, per thousand and you get $31.11, you’re still paying $2600 for the policy. 2600/72=31.11

      Later, around age 65, your “Cash Value” is let’s say $45,000, but the insurance part that you are actually paying for is now only $55,000. Still paying $2600 for the 100K policy, but the Insurance Company is only on the hook for $55K and you are now paying $47.27 cost per year, per thousand. (2600/55=47.27)

      Your cost per year, per thousand has gone up each and every year since you bought the Whole Life policy, but if you had bought the “ART” you would STILL be paying MUCH LESS per year than $2600 for the 100K policy!

      What starts high only gets higher, but what starts low, still gets higher but only reaches the equivalent of the initial Whole Life Rate at a much older age, than “Retirement Age”

      There is no possible way for insurance costs to NOT go up each year, but it is what you actually pay for the policy that makes the difference!

      The reason you buy Life insurance is to keep your dependents out of the “Poor House” if you die. You are paying off debts and replacing your income. You only insure ASSETS, and never Liabilities. Children are a financial liability, not an ‘asset’ never insure children, if that is taking one dime away from the BREADWINNER’S ability to buy insurance!

      It is the CURRENT total Face Value of your insurance that counts when you die, not how much you could have bought, had you done so.

      • Brandon McCullough

        Post like this are exactly why they say don’t believe everything you read on the Internet. I’m not trying to hurt your feelings, but everything you stated above is false. I am in the industry and am not going to defend what some bad agents do because there are a lot that just try to make money and there is a reason why people have a hard time trusting an agent. First, the commissions are actually opposite of what you said. Whole life will pay anywhere from 12 to 55% depending on company (reputable company) and product e.g. 10 pay, pay to 100, high early cash value. Term policies actually range from 80% to 129%. Your numbers above are hugely skewed too. Also there is a huge difference in whole life policies and companies. If you had bought one 42 years ago from One of the top mutuals = only place anyone should buy one you would easily have 3.5 to 5 times any amount you put in providing PUA was elected. Those companies would be. MassMutual, Northwestern Mutual, Guardian, New York Life. I promise you that anyone you ever meet that has had a policy with one of these companies for over 30 years is very happy about that decision. The problem is most are sold and not explained properly the complete function and timeline and probably didn’t have a policy properly designed to break even early right on the MEC border. Also whole life shouldn’t be sold as an investment it should be sold as diversification and more of a high powered savings account. I’ll sell term all day at my 100% commission and do, but whole life has its place as well and should be properly placed. I hope you don’t feel too foolish now that you know a 50 dollar term policy actually pays a higher commission than a 100 dollar whole life. Please stop posting on things you have no knowledge of, I know it is well placed because you think you are helping open people’s eyes, which would be true if your facts were even close, but since they are made up and backwards just stay out because you are actually muddying the waters just as much as unethical agents and advisors. Both you and the agent saying whole life is the greatest investment etc…. Are dead wrong and make it hard for people to get actual knowledge.

        • Just_me_and_God

          I was also in the “Protection Racket” and everything I reported, I learned from my own personal experience! It is entirely FACTUAL, and you are full of BS! Just like most Insurance agents!

        • RedDiamond11th

          Re this comment: “Cash Value” Life Insurance is entirely self-serving to the Insurance Industry, and they prey on even the poorest of people, by promoting the ‘Cash Values’.”
          –this is exactly how my in-laws, who are very low income, were persuaded to buy whole life policies.

          Re this comment: “the more likely scenario of someone paying into these policies for decades. ”
          –again, my in-laws have paid into these policies for decades for a piddly $10k in death benefit. Over the 40 years they’ve paid into these small policies, they accumulated about 1/2 that in cash value ($5k each). On the one policy for my father-in-law, he’s paid over $7k in premiums over that 40 years and needs to continue paying them in order to keep the policy in force. That money would have served them better invested in other ways.

          The big problem for the low-income people that these policies are sold to really becomes apparent when/if they need to qualify for Medicaid. Medicaid views cash value in a life insurance policy as an asset. Some states have asset limits as low as $1500 to qualify for Medicaid. So what has happened in the case of my in-laws was they had to take a loan against the only burial insurance they have (or can ever get at this point). This adds more undue burden on their already stressed financial situation because they now have to make premium payments AND interest payments to keep the policies in force. The cash value/loan money has to be “spent down” on nursing home care or some other Medicaid approved expenses before they will start picking up the tab.

          Speaking from experience, life insurance of any type should be sold by a qualified, licensed financial advisor who knows your WHOLE financial picture, not just that you make enough money to afford a premium. Cash value might sound great, but do the math and make sure it makes sense!

        • Just_me_and_God

          Thanks for your reply.
          Perhaps I can help you on that!
          There is what is known as “Non-forfeiture Values” it will be on your policy papers.
          You have several Options, which all involve never making another payment, (however the cash-value loan does present a problem, and you must discuss this with the insurance company)
          Option 1, Take a reduced death benefit, but paid-up for life.
          Option 2, Take a full death benefit, but paid-up for a certain length of time.
          Option 3, Take the cash value money, and give up the policy.
          (Take the cash-value money and Run!)

          When my daughter was born we bought a Whole Life Policy for her, (I did not understand about insurance at that time and trusted the Agent and the Company to do the right thing) Later when I got wised up and she was 8 years old, we took Option 2, and the full policy value was in force until she was 35 years old, before it ran out. YES, it was OVERPAID that far in advance!

          We took Option 3 on our own policies and I had a loan out on one of them, as I was “Insurance Poor” (Way too much Premium, and not enough coverage) However that loan was NOT a problem, we just received that much less, in the Cash Value Return (Cash-Value minus loan, minus the current amount of interest owed.)

          There is a “Age 55 and over” policy advertised on TV right now that is “only” $9.95 per week, for 2,000 dollars in coverage.
          9.95 x 52 = 517.40 per year.
          $2,000/ 517.40 = In 3.87 years it is entirely paid for, but your STILL paying for it!
          I call that a Rip-off!

          Feel free to ask any questions that you may have.

        • Qantum Ice Breaker

          I don’t convince clients about anything. I make questions and I give them what they want. I don’t “sell” insurance to anyone.. That stuff is past procedure and low rent …
          If you don’t believe in insurance , you should not buy it.
          I just gave 50 bucks to crowd fund to a apparently smart business dude that died with heart attack and had no life insurance.
          If you don’t understand the value of insurance, you should not buy it . Period.

          Now, this guy was young… If he spentv50 bucks a month on a term policy, his family could bury him and throw a party :) what’s right and wrong is not for you or me to decide . It’s about perspective …
          I am from a place that has a lot of popular humor… One of the jokes goes like this:
          “If my grandma had balls, she would be my grandpa but she didn’t… So she was was my grandma.”

        • Just_me_and_God

          Standard Industry Practice:
          Sell Reducing Term Insurance, to cover a home mortgage (likely a good value at a reasonable price) and the Agent collects his 40% Commission.
          Several years later, your Agent come back to sell you a Cash-Value Policy, REPLACEING all or some of the Reducing Term Mortgage Policy. The sales pitch is, that you can eventually use the Cash-Value to pay off the loan early.
          He only helps himself to the contents of your back pocket again!
          You however, just get a Much BIGGER Premium, to pay, but NO increase in Coverage!
          Now your wonderful Agent collects 70% Commission, but not on just the ‘Increase in Premium’ over and above the premium of the Term policy, but on the full premium amount of the entire New Policy.

          This rip-off is taught in the Life Industry, “Life Underwriter Training Classes!” Or as it is better known as the “LUTC”.
          But I call it: “How to rip-off the Public and keep them smiling!”

          P.S. Had you taken the ‘Increase in Premium’ and put it directly on the mortgage, you would have paid it off much, much faster!

      • Qantum Ice Breaker

        You are high on weed, had detergent instead of vodka, or need to read other books because your mindset is highly compromised. There are bad agents, and the others :).
        Price is the price for term. So if I ask: would you rather pay 80 bucks or 140 and have cash value growing at 5 or 6 %? The rate is not guaranteed, and I tell that to the client too….If they have a good amount of cash coming in, they will get the universal life. They know (because I told them ) that is not a guaranteed product like whole life, and I tell them if the policy is used correctly, they should be rolling over the cash value into a whole life or use the cash at 70-75 years old or so.

        What is their option? To put the cash into the bank at 000.1% or give it to someone that may or not know what their doing in the stock market? The middle and lower class are the most undeserved folks. With that said, I don’t work with variable products, and I am independent and I say it the way it is…Could I make more money if I pushed UL all the time? maybe, depending on the product…i don’t know where you got those percentages…and then thinking that you can use those as a rule is naive…Yes, there are greedy agents out there…. like there are pastors in the church too that need lots of help.

        • Just_me_and_God

          Your lead-in is so insulting and immature, I will not continue reading past your first sentence.
          Anything else you write, will not be read by me either!

      • Eric W

        As a financial advisor, I’ve recently been in competition with other advisors/agents to acquire clients/prospects. The benefits of these policies and others such as VULs sound so great and from a great salesman are almost impossible to pass up.
        The insurance company makes a lot of money, the salesman makes a lot of money….mathematically, someone has to lose….guess who it is. Of course, it’s not the person who buys this insurance and dies quickly but the more likely scenario of someone paying into these policies for decades.
        Everyone is so concerned about taxes….there are many ways to reduce taxes….invest in tax-efficient vehicles such as ETFs or tax-free investments such as municipal bonds.
        Is being taxed on dividends/interest so bad anyways? Most people don’t have tax problems. Plus, the whole purpose of an investment is return of capital and growth.
        I do not work with high net worth individuals so in my opinion most people should buy term and invest the difference. Then, you don’t have to borrow from the policy, you can just use your own money that has grown overtime.
        I’m sick of hearing the stock market is rigged, etc. If the market doesn’t go up overtime (15+yrs) then the insurance company will be out of business anyways and we have bigger problems and I sure as heck don’t want my money tied up in an insurance policy.
        Anyways…if I sold more insurance policies I’d be a lot richer….

        • Just_me_and_God

          Finally! Someone with a head on his shoulders!
          Thank you for your reply!

          I have demonstrated the “who loses” using 3 fingers, I hold up my index, middle, and ring fingers, naming the index as the Insurance Company who makes lots of money selling Cash Value Insurance, and then putting it down. Then naming the ring finger as the Agent who also makes lots of money selling Cash Value Insurance and then putting it down. Leaving only the middle figure still standing as the Buyer, who pays for it all.

    • Just_me_and_God

      Yes you would be charged interest to “Borrow” your own money, and it REDUCES the available Death Benefit by the same amount plus any interest currently owed.

      On the second question: NO, not on a standard Cash Value Policy.
      Technically you ‘can’, but only IF the Cash value exceeds the Death Benefit, but only the amount that Exceeds the Death benefit!

      However there are some Life policies that do pay BOTH. Ask your Agent or the Company.

      READ your Policy, so many people do not, and get all screwed up, by not understanding what is in the policy.

      Twenty years later, can anyone remember the fine details you agent told you when you bought it, or even if he told you the WHOLE Truth?

  • Marcus W.

    Your beneficiaries would receive the life insurance death benefit most likely tax free. The savings account funds would be taxed and possibly go through probate etc… If all of the monies were in the whole life insurance policy, your heirs would more likely have a bigger overall death benefit. You would most likely have higher growth in your cash value, with your monies in a whole life insurance policy, than putting money in a savings account. In a whole life insurance policy your money grows tax free, compounds tax free, and can be borrowed while still earning the compounding tax free interest.

    • Just_me_and_God

      You can get all those same Tax advantages from your OWN insurance company, by investing in their one of their Annuities and having one of their preferable Term policies.
      You would be also able to afford a much LARGER Insurance Policy, MUCH MORE SAVINGS and your Heirs would receive BOTH!
      You will still be CHARGED for “Borrowing your own Money”, but you may have access to third-party credit on especially advantageous terms, you might opt to borrow against your annuity instead. The annuity has a cash surrender value, and can be used as collateral for that amount.

      But your dear, sweet Insurance Company would rather keep that as a big deep, dark SECRET!
      Sush, don’t tell anybody!

  • Pam

    Hi Evan, Thank you for the interesting perspective on whole life insurance. I actually bought a policy for myself and my daughter more than 40 years ago and am extremely pleased. It is just a $10K policy but our premiums are less than $100 per year – that’s right – per year and my main goal was just to have enough to bury either of us if something happened – plus 40 years ago, $10K was an annual income for most. I do have a question though. In your article, you state the dividends are not taxable but I receive a statement each year and do list the dividend as income on my taxes. Are you sure the dividends do not count as income? I will need to follow up on this. I know I have to pay my taxes but definitely do not want to pay more than necessary.

  • Michelle

    I have become a beneficiary of a 70 year old whole life insurance policy. It started out as a 500$ policy, and I do not know as of yet what the amount will be …. Any idea ? And how do I pay the taxes on that?